Paragraph: (Society_Law_and_Justice/oanc-FY_04_Budget_Outlook-0.txt)
Sent 1: The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001.
Sent 2: If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy.
Sent 3: Opposition to the organization has cooled since 1996, when Congress approved restrictions (PL 104-134) on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take.
Sent 4: (1996 Almanac, p.
Sent 5: 5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly.
Sent 6: Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million.
Sent 7: The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
Sent 8: If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding.
Sent 9: The federal government began funding some programs to provide legal assistance to the poor in the late 1960s; the Legal Services Corporation was created in 1974 (PL 93-355).
Sent 10: LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four.
Sent 11: Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC.
Sent 12: Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs
Question: What year did the Republicans cut the LSC's budget? (false/0)
Question: What types of cases were prohibited by PL 104-134? (false/1)
Question: The Senate's onetime added contribution of $19 million to the LSC budget will go towards helping what cause? (true/2)
Question: Which political party cut the LSC's budget? (true/3)
Question: List the current budget of the LSC, and the budget with the addition of the onetime increase. (true/4)
Question: What organization did Congress approve restriction on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take? (true/5)
Question: Republicans cut which organization's budget deeply in 1996? (true/6)
Question: What actions taken toward the LSC makes us think the view of the LSC might be a politically motivated one? (true/7)
Question: Provide the year in which the LSC was created and a summary of its services. (false/8)
Question: Opposition to which organization has cooled since 1996? (true/9)
Question: What organization redistributed its funding based on census counts in Ohio and Michigan? (true/10)
Question: What has happened to the LSC's funding since the 1996 budget cut? (false/11)
Last updated: Mon Apr 16 04:55:33 EDT 2018
Generated from a file named: /Users/daniel/ideaProjects/hard-qa/split/train_456.json